I hate SATs.
I hate sats.
I really despise them.
I totally resent their existence in my world.
I would rather listen to the European Union debate the straightness and length of bananas in Danish, than I would do sats.
I refuse to capitlise them.
This week we have had mock optional sats. Look at those words. mock (as in pretend) optional (as in don't have to do it) and sats (as in standard assessment tests). Now lets look at what they really mean.
Mock - yes, these are only the pretend ones however they will enable us to start calculating the results for the final ones and so we can look at who needs boosting in the last few weeks and identify weak spots to focus on before we do the test - but lest not teach to the test.........
Optional - no you don't have to do them, but if you don't then you need to have 900million good reasons why not, or else it's a case of "What are you scared of?"
sats - superfluous asinine torture for students. No, really, that's what it means.
Take the reading test on Monday. My children, from rural Ruralshire, had to read and answer a series of ridiculous questions on a story about road racing in Namibia. And then on the Tuesday, they had to write an alternative ending for said road race in Namibia. My children know very little about Namibia. It's not in Geography, so we aren't allowed to teach it. There isn't time. There's no rounding of children's education these days from their exposure to a variety of teachers with a variety of interests.
As you may have gathered, I'm not keen on sats.
From an ASD point of view, I took children out of their usual groups, put them into different rooms and asked them to sit still for 30 minutes and write the answers to questions that they couldn't read about a story that they didn't understand.
I'm going for a cup of tea. And then I'm going to mark the cursed sats.
I really despise them.
I totally resent their existence in my world.
I would rather listen to the European Union debate the straightness and length of bananas in Danish, than I would do sats.
I refuse to capitlise them.
This week we have had mock optional sats. Look at those words. mock (as in pretend) optional (as in don't have to do it) and sats (as in standard assessment tests). Now lets look at what they really mean.
Mock - yes, these are only the pretend ones however they will enable us to start calculating the results for the final ones and so we can look at who needs boosting in the last few weeks and identify weak spots to focus on before we do the test - but lest not teach to the test.........
Optional - no you don't have to do them, but if you don't then you need to have 900million good reasons why not, or else it's a case of "What are you scared of?"
sats - superfluous asinine torture for students. No, really, that's what it means.
Take the reading test on Monday. My children, from rural Ruralshire, had to read and answer a series of ridiculous questions on a story about road racing in Namibia. And then on the Tuesday, they had to write an alternative ending for said road race in Namibia. My children know very little about Namibia. It's not in Geography, so we aren't allowed to teach it. There isn't time. There's no rounding of children's education these days from their exposure to a variety of teachers with a variety of interests.
As you may have gathered, I'm not keen on sats.
From an ASD point of view, I took children out of their usual groups, put them into different rooms and asked them to sit still for 30 minutes and write the answers to questions that they couldn't read about a story that they didn't understand.
I'm going for a cup of tea. And then I'm going to mark the cursed sats.
